首页> 外文OA文献 >A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial
【2h】

A Randomised tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST pilot randomised trial

机译:加速转移至心脏骤停中心以进行非ST段抬高型室颤的院外心脏骤停的随机试验:ARREST飞行员随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Wide variation exists in inter-hospital survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Regionalisation of care into cardiac arrest centres (CAC)may improve this. We report a pilot randomised trial of expedited transfer to a CAC following OHCA without ST-elevation.The objective was to assess the feasibility of performing a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Methods Adult witnessed ventricular fibrillation OHCA of presumed cardiac cause were randomised 1:1 to either: 1) treatment: comprising expedited transfer to a CAC for goal-directed therapy including access to immediate reperfusion, or 2) control: comprising current standard of care involving delivery to the geographically closest hospital. The feasibility of randomisation, protocol adherence and data collection of the primary (30-day all-cause mortality) and secondary (cerebral performance category (CPC)) and in-hospital major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)) clinical outcome measures were assessed. Results Between November 2014 and April 2016, 118 cases were screened, of which 63 patients (53%) met eligibility criteria and 40 of the 63 patients (63%) were randomised. There were no protocol deviations in the treatment arm. Data collection of primary and secondary outcomes was achieved in 83%. There was no difference in baseline characteristicsbetween the groups: 30-day mortality (Intervention 9/18, 50% vs. Control 6/15, 40%; P = 0.73), CPC 1/2 (Intervention: 9/18, 50% vs. Control 7/14, 50%; P > 0.99) or MACCE (Intervention: 9/18, 50% vs. Control 6/15, 40%; P = 0.73). Conclusions These findings support the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a large-scale randomised controlled trial of expedited transfer to CAC following OHCA to address a remaining uncertainty in post-arrest care.
机译:背景由于院外心脏骤停(OHCA),医院间生存率存在很大差异。将护理区域划分为心脏骤停中心(CAC)可能会改善这一情况。我们报告了在无ST抬高的情况下进行OHCA后快速转移至CAC的试验性随机试验,目的是评估进行大规模随机对照试验的可行性。方法成人见证的心源性房颤原发性心房颤动OHCA 1:1随机分配至:1)治疗:包括加急转移到CAC进行目标导向治疗,包括立即再灌注;或2)对照:包括当前涉及的护理标准运送到地理位置最近的医院。评估了随机,方案依从性和主要(30天全因死亡率)和次要(脑功能类别(CPC))以及院内主要心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)临床结果测量数据收集的可行性。结果2014年11月至2016年4月,共筛查118例患者,其中63例(53%)符合入选标准,而63例患者中的40例(63%)被随机分配。在治疗组中没有方案偏差。主要和次要结果的数据收集达到了83%。两组之间的基线特征无差异:30天死亡率(干预9 / 18,50%与对照组6 / 15,40%; P = 0.73),CPC 1/2(干预:9 / 18,50%相对于对照组7/14,50%; P> 0.99)或MACCE(干预:9/18,50%对对照组6/15,40%; P = 0.73)。结论这些发现支持OHCA后进行大规模转移至CAC的大规模随机对照试验的可行性和可接受性,以解决逮捕后护理中仍然存在的不确定性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号